Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
S Afr J Surg ; 60(2): 119-123, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1940305

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnostic and surgical breast cancer services at Groote Schuur Hospital (GSH) and affiliated hospitals. METHODS: All patients, newly diagnosed, awaiting surgery, and listed for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) by the breast surgical service from 23 March - 23 June 2020 were included. A historic control was used where appropriate consisting of patients presenting in the same period in 2019. Clinic attendance records and surgical waiting lists were used to identify patients in the three months and data were extracted from hospital records including hospital admission records and surgical operative notes. RESULTS: The number of patients who presented with a new breast symptom to the diagnostic breast clinic decreased from 1 094 in 2019 to 299 in 2020, representing a 72.6% decrease. Telemedicine use as a function of the total follow-ups increased from 53% (n = 1 350) in 2019 to 75% (n = 735) in 2020. The overall number of new breast cancers diagnosed decreased from 146 in 2019 to 79 in 2020, but the proportion of patients seen with a new breast symptom who were diagnosed with breast cancer increased from 13% (n = 1 094) in 2019 to 26% (n = 299) in 2020. Eighteen per cent (n = 105) fewer breast cancer surgeries were performed in 2020 compared to 2019, with immediate breast reconstructive procedures representing the largest decrease of 40%. CONCLUSION: The impact of COVID-19 on breast cancer services has been both at the diagnostic level and in delays to surgery. A new online referral system improved referral efficacy translating to more cancers being diagnosed as a function of total referrals. The drop in absolute numbers of cancer diagnoses, however, represents an unmet health need. An expansion of our telemedicine service mitigated COVID risk in the outpatient setting. The greatest impact on our treatment decisions was seen in the cohort of patients placed on neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). We saw a global decrease in breast surgeries performed, with the greatest decrease being in reconstructions.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , COVID-19 , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Pandemias , Sudáfrica/epidemiología
2.
Sajog-South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology ; 26(2):44-45, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1266908
3.
S Afr Med J ; 111(5): 426-431, 2021 03 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1256982

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical operations have been drastically reduced in South Africa (SA). Guidelines on surgical prioritisation during COVID-19 have been published, but are specific to high-income countries. There is a pressing need for context-specific guidelines and a validated tool for prioritising surgical cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. In March 2020, the South African National Surgical Obstetric Anaesthesia Plan Task Team was asked by the National Department of Health to establish a national framework for COVID-19 surgical prioritisation. OBJECTIVES: To develop a national framework for COVID-19 surgical prioritisation, including a set of recommendations and a risk calculatorfor operative care. METHODS: The surgical prioritisation framework was developed in three stages: (i) a literature review of international, national and local recommendations on COVID-19 and surgical care was conducted; (ii) a set of recommendations was drawn up based on the available literature and through consensus of the COVID-19 Task Team; and (iii) a COVID-19 surgical risk calculator was developed and evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 30 documents were identified from which recommendations around prioritisation of surgical care were used to draw up six recommendations for preoperative COVID-19 screening and testing as well as the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. Ninety-nine perioperative practitioners from eight SA provinces evaluated the COVID-19 surgical risk calculator, which had high acceptability and a high level of concordance (81%) with current clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: This national framework on COVID-19 surgical prioritisation can help hospital teams make ethical, equitable and personalised decisions whether to proceed with or delay surgical operations during this unprecedented epidemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Cuidados Críticos/ética , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Triaje/normas , COVID-19/epidemiología , Consenso , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Sudáfrica , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/normas
4.
South African Journal of Surgery ; 58(3):123-124, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1055347
5.
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology ; 26(1):2-3, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-886451
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA